linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] undertaker 1.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1101282126210.31804@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date:	Fri, 28 Jan 2011 21:41:18 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Reinhard Tartler <Reinhard.Tartler@...ormatik.uni-erlangen.de>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	vamos@...informatik.uni-erlangen.de, Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] undertaker 1.0

On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> [2] http://www4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/Research/VAMOS/linux-trees/

Nice effort.

I had a quick look into kernel/irq/

The red section in irqdesc.c

280 #if defined(CONFIG_KSTAT_IRQS_ONDEMAND)

is indeed dead code.

The one in manage.c is not:

 921 #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_RELEASE_METHOD

CONFIG_IRQ_RELEASE_METHOD is set by arch/um. Ditto for include/linux/irq.h

It'd be nice if the web interface would have a knob to jump to the
next red section. Scrolling through is annoying.

Thanks,

	tglx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/