[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201101292215.57292.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:15:57 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] merge 32/64 bits realmode wakeup code
On Saturday, January 29, 2011, matthieu castet wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> > On Thursday, January 27, 2011, matthieu castet wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> this patch merge 32 and 64 realmode wakeup code :
> >> - this mean less ifdef in code
> >> - we could remove now unused field in wakeup_header (pmode_*)
> >> - this allow to set the first 1 MB NX.
> >>
> >> Do you think it is safe on all X86 32 bit machine ?
> >>
> >> Matthieu
> >>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Matthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>
> >
> > It _looks_ sane, but it will require some serious testing. I'm not sure,
> > though, if we can get enough testing coverage without actually committing
> > that change.
> >
> > How much testing has it received so far?
> >
> Not too much only qemu with 1 and 2 core and a laptop with 1 cpu.
>
> Please note that with this patch we can also remove the gdt, idt, ldt stuff from
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S
That's correct, but those changes can wait. The most urgent thing is to fix
the resume regression at hand. I guess we should ask the reporter's in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27472 to test that patch, right?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists