linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] merge 32/64 bits realmode wakeup code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201101301359.18869.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:59:18 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] merge 32/64 bits realmode wakeup code

On Sunday, January 30, 2011, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 01/29/2011 01:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > That's correct, but those changes can wait.  The most urgent thing is to fix
> > the resume regression at hand.  I guess we should ask the reporter's in
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27472 to test that patch, right?
> >
> 
> By the way, guys: I'm on vacation at the moment, but I do monitor this 
> thread.  I think at this point we should revert NX for the low 1 MiB and 
> worry about doing it properly for .39.

Fine by me, this is your call anyway.

> That being said, this kind of unification is a good thing in general.

Sure.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/