| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110130210441.150e1006@mat-laptop> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:04:41 +0100 From: matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] merge 32/64 bits realmode wakeup code Le Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:15:57 +0100, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> a écrit : > On Saturday, January 29, 2011, matthieu castet wrote: > > Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit : > > > > > > It _looks_ sane, but it will require some serious testing. I'm > > > not sure, though, if we can get enough testing coverage without > > > actually committing that change. > > > > > > How much testing has it received so far? > > > > > Not too much only qemu with 1 and 2 core and a laptop with 1 cpu. > > > > Please note that with this patch we can also remove the gdt, idt, > > ldt stuff from arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S > > That's correct, but those changes can wait. Any idea how to test this patch with more configurations ? Submitting it to tip ? But as resume regression showed, there aren't many user with 32 bits system using it. Matthieu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists