[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110131140257.GA28827@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:02:57 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, clg@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] pidns: Call pid_ns_prepare_proc from
create_pid_namespace
On 01/31, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> On 01/31/2011 02:22 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 01/31, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> @@ -96,6 +97,9 @@ static struct pid_namespace *create_pid_namespace(struct pid_namespace *parent_p
>>> for (i = 1; i< PIDMAP_ENTRIES; i++)
>>> atomic_set(&ns->pidmap[i].nr_free, BITS_PER_PAGE);
>>>
>>> + if (pid_ns_prepare_proc(ns))
>>> + goto out_free_map;
>>> +
>>> return ns;
>> This is not right, afaics. I already sent the similar patches, but
>> they were ignored ;)
>>
>> Please see http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127697484000334
>>
>> If pid_ns_prepare_proc() fails we shouldn't blindly return ENOMEM
>> and, more importantly, we need put_pid_ns(parent_ns).
>
> Oh, ok. Right. Thanks for the pointer.
>
> Are you ok if I replace the patch 2/4 with your patch ?
My patch depends on 1/4, http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127697468632667
Your change looks very similar to 1/4 + 3/4. Just fix the problem
in create_pid_namespace(), no need to replace.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists