[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110131155411.GA1613@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:54:11 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, jan.kratochvil@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET RFC] ptrace,signal: clean transition between STOPPED
and TRACED
On 01/31, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:40:30PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > Okay, just finished ran make check with and without the patchset.
> > > Without the patchset, 2.6.38-rc2 failed five tests.
> >
> > Hmm. I didn't think we were in that poor a state, but it has been quite a
> > while since I looked. I wonder if that's a regression from a few releases
> > back, or what. Oleg and Jan should know better than I do about the state
> > of these tests.
>
> Also, the first test of xcheck seems to enter infinite loop.
Are you sure late-ptrace-may-attach-check hangs? Perhaps it is the next
one, tracer-lockup-on-sighandler-kill, it needs a lot of time to finish.
IIRC, some time ago I did the testing with your patches applied (under
kvm), I didn't notice anything unexpected.
Unfortunately, these tests are more or less "random", usually a new
test-case appears when we find a bug.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists