[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1296498940.26427.42.camel@moss-pluto>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:35:40 -0500
From: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
To: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
selinux <selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] RFC: selinux: sysctl: fix selinux labeling broken
by last patch
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 19:03 +0200, Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov> wrote:
> > /proc/sys inode labeling was disabled earlier (hence marked S_PRIVATE)
> > when /proc/sys was reimplemented by Eric, so all access control
> > on /proc/sys was switched to using the sysctl hook rather than the
> > inode-based checking. That's why you don't get a result from ls -Z
> > on /proc/sys on current kernels. Getting actual labeling working again
> > for those inodes would be a win, so your patch is an improvement in that
> > regard for selinux.
>
>
> Oh, OK. Thanks for letting me know.
>
> Do you see anything else that is wrong with these patches (apart from
> "//deleted")?
No, although I think someone should take them for a spin on a modern
Fedora in enforcing mode for a bit, and likely run the selinux testsuite
too.
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists