linux-kernel - Re: Fwd: [PATCH] bq27x00

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D470A8B.70700@metafoo.de>
Date:	Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:16:27 +0100
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:	Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
CC:	Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@...il.com>,
	Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...ux.it>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH] bq27x00_battery: Some fixes

On 01/31/2011 07:27 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 07:15:06PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 01/31/2011 02:54 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>>> The same is for this patch.
>>>
>>> Comments, Reviewed-by or Acked-by?
>>>
>>> p.s. FWIW, I already asked Pali to factor out bq27x00_battery_time()
>>>      fix to a separate patch.
>>>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I have a larger series pending which adds support for the bq27000 chip and polling to
>> the bq27x00 driver. Since this series does some refactoring of the bq27x00 driver, it
>> might make sense to rebase this (and the other) patch ontop of that series instead of
>> the other way around.
> 
> Pali was first to send out his work, so I think that it would make
> sense to ask you to rebase your work on top. Especially since Pali's
> patches were somewhat reviewed already.

I suspect it to be substantial more work to rebase mine on top of his. That's why I'm
asking for a exception in this case. I would be willing to adjust his patches, so
they can be applied on top of mine.

> 
> I hope Pali will resend the fixed versions quickly enough so
> that I'll apply the patches asap and you'll easily use git
> for rebasing.
> 

git won't help in this case, because my patches basically rewrite the parts changed
by Palis patches. It would be one merge conflict after another, I guess.

> Thanks!
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/