linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slab tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1296502339.30654.13.camel@jaguar>
Date:	Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:32:19 +0200
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slab tree

On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 14:42 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the slab tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c: In function 'ext4_exit_mballoc':
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2750: error: implicit declaration of function 'kmem_cache_name'
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2750: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
> 
> Caused by commit 63310467a3d1ed6a0460ec1f4268126cd1ceec2e ("mm: Remove
> support for kmem_cache_name()").  Clearly the last user has not gone, yet.
> 
> I have used the version of the slab tree from next-20110121 for today.

Christoph, Ted? Should I revert the patch from slab.git?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/