linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] broken ebba638ae723d8a8fc2f7abce5ec18b688b791d7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110131235231.GJ4557@outflux.net>
Date:	Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:52:31 -0800
From:	Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
To:	matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] broken ebba638ae723d8a8fc2f7abce5ec18b688b791d7

Hi Matthieu,

On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 12:11:16AM +0100, matthieu castet wrote:
> Kees Cook a écrit :
> >On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 06:24:14PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >>On 01/27/2011 03:00 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> >>>Yikes, good catch.
> >>>
> >>>arch/x86/kernel/trampoline_64.S uses:
> >>>        movw    $(trampoline_stack_end - r_base), %sp
> >>>
> >>>arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S uses:
> >>>        movl    $boot_stack_end, %eax
> >>>        addl    %ebp, %eax
> >>>        movl    %eax, %esp
> >>>
> >>>what would be safe for arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S ? It uses "stack_start",
> >>>but later after paging set-up. Is the following sane to solve this?
> >>>
> >>To run it before paging is set up, you can't use stack, start; you
> >>have to use a pointer based on physical address.  You have two
> >>problems with using stack_start: you're using a linear address to
> >>access stack_start, and stack_start itself contains a linear
> >>address.
> >>
> >>It's not entirely clear to me why we don't initialize %ss to
> >>__BOOT_DS with the other segment registers, but it would make most
> >>sense to me:
> >>
> >>diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
> >>index fc293dc..c10f9ba 100644
> >>--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
> >>+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
> >>@@ -99,7 +99,12 @@ ENTRY(startup_32)
> >>        movl %eax,%es
> >>        movl %eax,%fs
> >>        movl %eax,%gs
> >>+       movl %eax,%ss
> >> 2:
> >>+/*
> >>+ * Set up an initial stack
> >>+ */
> >>+       movl $pa(init_thread_union+THREAD_SIZE), %esp
> >>
> >> /*
> >>  * Clear BSS first so that there are no surprises...
> >
> >This doesn't appear to work for me. While I can boot fine, doing CPU
> >hotplugging hangs the system. :(
> >
> This is weird because the patch only touch first cpu (startup_32
> entry) and cpu hotplug go to startup_32_smp.
> 
> Here a untested patch that move the stack setup in the common path.
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
> index fc293dc..5df3432 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
> @@ -284,6 +284,12 @@ ENTRY(startup_32_smp)
>  	movl %eax,%gs
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>  default_entry:
> +	/*
> +	 * Set up an initial stack
> +	 */
> +	movl $(__BOOT_DS),%eax
> +	movl %eax,%ss
> +	movl $pa(init_thread_union+THREAD_SIZE), %esp
>  
>  /*
>   *	New page tables may be in 4Mbyte page mode and may

This worked, thanks! If this tests cleanly for you in qemu, we should get
this committed.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/