[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1101311120530.31804@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:23:21 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Torben Hohn <torbenh@....de>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, johnstul@...ibm.com,
hch@...radead.org, yong.zhang0@...il.com,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/20] alpha: change do_timer() to xtime_update()
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Torben Hohn wrote:
> xtime_update() takes the xtime_lock itself.
> state does not to be protected with this lock.
> its only touched here and during init.
xtime_lock very well serializes the access to state on
SMP. timer_interrupt() is called on each cpu. So that wont work.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists