[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1296577030.26581.236.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:17:10 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aliguori@...ibm.com,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM-GST: KVM Steal time registration
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 13:53 -0200, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
> And since the granularity of the cpu accounting is too coarse, we end up
> with much more steal time than we should, because things that are less
> than 1 unity of cputime, are often rounded up to 1 unity of cputime.
See, that! is the problem, don't round up like that.
What you can do is: steal_ticks = steal_time_clock() / TICK_NSEC, or
simply keep a steal time delta and every time it overflows
cputime_one_jiffy insert a steal-time tick.
Venki might have created some infrastructure for doing this with the
IRQ_TIME accounting mess, but irqtime_account_process_tick() still gives
me a head-ache.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists