[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1k4hjqzql.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 12:14:10 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] security/selinux: fix /proc/sys/ labeling
Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>> What kernel has a dentry_path_raw? Perhaps you mean __dentry_path?
>
>
> See the function here:
> https://github.com/mirrors/linux-2.6/blob/70d1f365568e0cdbc9f4ab92428e1830fdb09ab0/fs/dcache.c
>
> The last patches were against 2.6.38-rc2 because the dcache layer got
> rewritten in 2.6.38 http://lwn.net/Articles/421784/
>
> __dentry_path is now static (in fs/dcache.c) and does not take the
> necessary locks.
Thanks. I thought I was looking at the latest source but it turns out
I fat fingered something and my tree was still 2.6.36-rc3. Sigh.
dentry_path_raw does seem reasonable.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists