[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1102012213510.31804@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 22:14:57 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@...cron.at>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 08/28] posix-timers: Cleanup restart_block usage
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, john stultz wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 13:51 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > - restart_block->fn = posix_cpu_nsleep_restart;
> > - restart_block->arg0 = which_clock;
> > - restart_block->arg1 = (unsigned long) rmtp;
> > - restart_block->arg2 = t.tv_sec;
> > - restart_block->arg3 = t.tv_nsec;
> > + restart_block->nanosleep.expires = timespec_to_ns(&t);
>
> The conversion back and forth from nanoseconds to timespec seems a
> little extraneous, but short of reworking all of the do_nanosleep calls
> to take a ktime I don't see a clean solution (since hrtimer also uses
> the restart_block).
We could simply add a timespec to the nanosleep struct in the
restart_block. Could be a union with expires.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists