[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878vy01udd.fsf@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:17:02 -0800
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: "Linux-pm mailing list" <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Power domains for platform bus type
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> writes:
> Hi,
>
> This is something we discussed during the last Linux Plumbers Conference.
>
> The problem appears to be that the same device may be used in different
> systems in different configurations such that actions necessary for the
> device's power management can vary from one system to another. In those
> cases the drivers' power management callbacks are generally not sufficient,
> because they can't take the configuration of the whole system into account.
>
> I think this issue may be addressed by adding objects that will represent
> power domains and will provide power management callbacks to be executed
> in addition to the device driver's PM callbacks, which is done by the patch
> below.
>
> Please have a look at it and tell me what you think.
>
FYI... I just tested this patch on OMAP by converting our existing use
of platform_bus_set_ops() to use this approach by adding a powerdomain
to each omap_device.
Note we're currently only overriding the runtime_[suspend|resume]
methods, so those are the only paths I've tested.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists