[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:17:06 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@...cron.at>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/28] Rework of the PTP support series core code
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 01:50:55PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The reason for this rework is that I got scared when reviewing:
> [PATCH V10 09/15] posix clocks: cleanup the CLOCK_DISPTACH macro
I am glad that you are taking the blame/credit ;)
> The patch is really too large and the risk of wreckage too high. So
> instead of whipping Richard through another round I reworked the
> series in the following way:
>
> 1) Split the CLOCK_DISPATCH cleanup in fine grained steps.
I didn't test or compile each of the little steps, but I have looked
the differences between where I landed with my V10 and this series.
> That allowed further cleanups and got rid of 200 lines of code and
> made a lot of functions static.
Yes, it looks even nicer than before, but I'll comment on a few small
points.
> Richard, can you please run that through your testing ? The PTP
> drivers apply on top of that.
I'll run my PTP tests today.
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists