[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinvQatNF0ZJqmvuKYNq7oKXqfR5Ke1FuaSLFNEF@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 20:03:30 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, mm: avoid stale tlb entries by clearing prev
mm_cpumask after switching mm
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Suresh Siddha
> <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
>> For the prev mm that is handing over the cpu to another mm, clear the cpu
>> from the mm_cpumask(prev) after the cr3 is changed.
>>
>> Otherwise, clearing the mm_cpumask early will avoid the flush tlb IPI's while
>> the cr3 and TLB's are still pointing to the prev mm. And this window can lead
>> to the stale (global) TLB entries.
>
> Why?
>
> This looks pointless. Explain why this matters. Global entries are
> never per-mm, so any global entries can never care about the
> mm_cpumask.
>
> And for any normal entries it doesn't matter if the IPI gets lost,
> since the TLB will be flushed (immediately afterwards) by the cr3
> write.
Actually, for normal entries I could well imagine the code that wants
to do a flush before freeing the page caring.
So I think the _patch_ may be correct, but the changelog is definitely
not correct, and needs serious surgery to explain what the bug that
this fixes actually is.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists