[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D4A3782.3050702@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:05:06 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/init: respect memblock reserved regions when destroying
mappings
On 01/31/2011 07:18 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> x86/mm/init: respect memblock reserved regions when destroying mappings
>
> In init_memory_mapping we are destroying all the mappings between
> _brk_end and _end, no matter if some memory areas in that range have
> been reserved using memblock_x86_reserve_range.
> Besides if _end is not pmd aligned we might destroy the
> mappings for valid memory between _end and the following pmd.
>
> In order to avoid this problem, before clearing any pmds we check if the
> corresponding memory area has been reserved and we only destroy the
> mapping if it hasn't.
>
> We found this problem because under Xen we have a valid mapping at _end,
> and if _end is not pmd aligned the current code destroys the initial
> part of it.
>
> In practice this fix does not have any impact on native.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
How on Earth would you end up with a reserved region *inside the BRK*?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists