[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110203060521.GA25739@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 22:05:21 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ia.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/19] twl4030: mfd_cell is now implicitly available to
drivers
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 08:15:22PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
> static int __devinit twl4030_vibra_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct twl4030_codec_vibra_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> + struct twl4030_codec_vibra_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
No, device's drvdata belongs to _this_ driver, and it is supposed to
manage it and use as it sees fit.
Note platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info) later in this function along with
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL) in twl4030_vibra_remove(), which means
that with your change you will be able to bind the device only once.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists