[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110203091227.GA1603@zhy>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:12:27 +0800
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Regression: WARNINGS and lockdep spews in 2.6.38-rc3+
(bisected).
Hi Nick,
Thanks for reporting this.
Could you please try below patch?
Thanks,
Yong
---
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] timer: use _local_bh_enable() in del_timer_sync()
Nick Bowler reported:
=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
2.6.38-rc3-bisect-00062-g8c007a1 #92
---------------------------------
inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage.
swapper/0 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
(&(&dev->event_lock)->rlock){?.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8125def6>] input_event+0x41/0x83
{HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
[<ffffffff810656d4>] mark_held_locks+0x52/0x70
[<ffffffff8106593a>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf7/0x135
[<ffffffff81065985>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff81044ac2>] __do_softirq+0x62/0x160
[<ffffffff8100395c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
[<ffffffff81044cf2>] _local_bh_enable_ip+0xb3/0xe3
[<ffffffff81044d3a>] local_bh_enable+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff8104a418>] del_timer_sync+0x4f/0x8e
[<ffffffffa00947fe>] rfkill_schedule_global_op+0x41/0x84 [rfkill]
[<ffffffffa0094858>] rfkill_schedule_evsw_rfkillall+0x17/0x19 [rfkill]
[<ffffffffa009495f>] rfkill_event+0x58/0x5a [rfkill]
[<ffffffff8125c980>] input_pass_event+0x97/0xea
[<ffffffff8125de13>] input_handle_event+0x460/0x46f
[<ffffffff8125df1b>] input_event+0x66/0x83
[<ffffffffa009becb>] tpacpi_send_radiosw_update+0x7f/0xc4 [thinkpad_acpi]
[<ffffffffa009c417>] hotkey_notify+0x507/0x581 [thinkpad_acpi]
[<ffffffffa009b029>] dispatch_acpi_notify+0x29/0x2b [thinkpad_acpi]
[<ffffffff8119a18a>] acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x62/0x7c
[<ffffffff8118b323>] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x24/0x31
[<ffffffff810511bf>] process_one_work+0x204/0x33b
[<ffffffff81053384>] worker_thread+0x136/0x255
[<ffffffff810566da>] kthread+0x7d/0x85
[<ffffffff81003864>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
irq event stamp: 559266
hardirqs last enabled at (559263): [<ffffffff811b40a5>] acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x236/0x275
hardirqs last disabled at (559264): [<ffffffff812ffd6a>] save_args+0x6a/0x70
softirqs last enabled at (559266): [<ffffffff81044bce>] _local_bh_enable+0xe/0x10
softirqs last disabled at (559265): [<ffffffff81044c0d>] irq_enter+0x3d/0x6f
other info that might help us debug this:
1 lock held by swapper/0:
#0: (&serio->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81259018>] serio_interrupt+0x24/0x7e
stack backtrace:
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: G W 2.6.38-rc3-bisect-00062-g8c007a1 #92
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff81065442>] ? valid_state+0x17e/0x191
[<ffffffff8100e159>] ? save_stack_trace+0x28/0x45
[<ffffffff81065d18>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x0/0x87
[<ffffffff81065568>] ? mark_lock+0x113/0x22d
[<ffffffff8106687f>] ? __lock_acquire+0x2ac/0xd01
[<ffffffff81065482>] ? mark_lock+0x2d/0x22d
[<ffffffff81065482>] ? mark_lock+0x2d/0x22d
[<ffffffff81065482>] ? mark_lock+0x2d/0x22d
[<ffffffff81067338>] ? lock_acquire+0x64/0x81
[<ffffffff8125def6>] ? input_event+0x41/0x83
[<ffffffff812ff378>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x53/0x65
[<ffffffff8125def6>] ? input_event+0x41/0x83
[<ffffffff8125def6>] ? input_event+0x41/0x83
[<ffffffff81261fb6>] ? atkbd_interrupt+0x9a/0x574
[<ffffffff81259034>] ? serio_interrupt+0x40/0x7e
[<ffffffff8125a31c>] ? i8042_interrupt+0x28e/0x2a8
[<ffffffff8107e834>] ? handle_IRQ_event+0x20/0xae
[<ffffffff810805e6>] ? handle_edge_irq+0xde/0x12a
[<ffffffff810055c9>] ? handle_irq+0x1f/0x2a
[<ffffffff81004c37>] ? do_IRQ+0x48/0xaf
[<ffffffff812ffe13>] ? ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1a
<EOI> [<ffffffff8100a1aa>] ? native_sched_clock+0x2d/0x5f
[<ffffffff811b40ac>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x23d/0x275
[<ffffffff811b40a5>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x236/0x275
[<ffffffff8126c2ae>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x9f/0xd5
[<ffffffff81001e75>] ? cpu_idle+0x61/0xaa
[<ffffffff812ecdc9>] ? rest_init+0xcd/0xd4
[<ffffffff812eccfc>] ? rest_init+0x0/0xd4
[<ffffffff81682d3d>] ? start_kernel+0x3a6/0x3b1
[<ffffffff816822b1>] ? x86_64_start_reservations+0xb8/0xbc
[<ffffffff816823bb>] ? x86_64_start_kernel+0x106/0x115
The cause is that local_bh_enable() could call do_softirq()
in certain time, thus break irq status and make lock bite
us.
Reported-and-bisected-by: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/timer.c | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
index 43ca993..253aefe 100644
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -969,10 +969,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_to_del_timer_sync);
int del_timer_sync(struct timer_list *timer)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+ unsigned long flags;
+
local_bh_disable();
lock_map_acquire(&timer->lockdep_map);
lock_map_release(&timer->lockdep_map);
- local_bh_enable();
+ /* raw_local_irq_[save|restore] is to protect _local_bh_enable() */
+ raw_local_irq_save(flags);
+ _local_bh_enable();
+ raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
#endif
/*
* don't use it in hardirq context, because it
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists