[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110203093120.GC2570@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:31:20 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jayamohan Kallickal <jayamohank@...verengines.com>,
Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/32] scsi/be2iscsi,qla2xxx: convert to
alloc_workqueue()
Hello, Mike.
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:41:22PM -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 04:25 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >usually necessary. The queue of pending works tend to be short and
> >consumed pretty fast.
>
> What if we want to do something that could take a while, like doing
> recovery of a device/transport (so you have to send resets and
> logouts/logins and wait for the results but they could take a while
> if they timeout), should we be using something other than a
> workqueue so it does not interfere with other users?
As long as you don't use ordered workqueue, it wouldn't be a problem.
The max concurrency is determined by @max_active parameter to
alloc_workqueue() and workqueue will try to provide concurrency upto
the limit on demand as long as resources are available.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists