[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110203175721.GB8785@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 18:57:21 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, X86-ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Willy Tarreau <wtarreau@...a.kernel.org>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@...radead.org>,
Dirk.Hohndel@...el.com, IDE-ML <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Fr?d?ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2][concept RFC] x86: BIOS-save kernel log to disk upon
panic
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 06:36 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > Could we read the log area, first, verify it contains signature, write
> > it back?
> > Pavel
>
> Yes, but that doesn't guarantee no data corruption caused by handing
> over from one driver to another.
Waiting a few seconds? Is there any sufficiently high number of X where waiting X
seconds would make it safe to touch the hardware? (i.e. it would guarantee that
pending commands are flushed, etc.)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists