| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110203185516.GA2560@schottelius.org> Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:55:16 +0100 From: Nico Schottelius <nico-kernel-20110117@...ottelius.org> To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>, Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>, Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>, Nico Schottelius <nico-kernel-20110117@...ottelius.org> Subject: Re: [Bug #28102] New display errors in 2.6.38-rc2-00175-g6fb1b30 Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>: > This should hopefully find the culprit: > $ git bisect start drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > $ git bisect good v2.6.37 > $ git bisect bad Just went that path, compiled 2.6.37-rc4-00292-g3c8cdf9 and suspended which resulted in a completly dead device (no ping, no ctrlaltdel possible), i.e. different fatal situation. I'm a bit confused, not sure whether this is related to the broken display issue or not. As the tests always cost a quite lengthy fsck run, I'd love to go a different way from 2.6.37, if anybody has a better hint. Cheers, Nico -- PGP key: 7ED9 F7D3 6B10 81D7 0EC5 5C09 D7DC C8E4 3187 7DF0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists