[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D4B0D18.9010309@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:16:24 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sodaville@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [sodaville] [PATCH v2 01/15] x86/e820: remove conditional early
mapping in parse_e820_ext
On 02/03/2011 12:09 PM, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> Daniel has a patch set that includes the following:
>
> 0010-OLPC-add-XO-1-rtc-driver.patch
>
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc.c
> @@ -311,6 +311,8 @@ static int __init add_xo1_platform_devices(void)
> {
> struct platform_device *pdev;
>
> + olpc_xo1_rtc_init();
> +
> pdev = platform_device_register_simple("xo1-rfkill", -1, NULL,
> 0);
>
>
> This registers a specific rtc device for XO-1 machines (using the
> CS5536 RTC). XO-1.5 uses ACPI and a Via-based board, so the RTC device
> should be handled there automatically. The corner case is for machines
> where the OLPC DT is enabled, but OLPC_XO1_RTC is not enabled. We
> still need to figure out what to do in that case, but I think it's more
> appropriate to focus on getting the PM and XO1_RTC stuff upstream
> first. As of right now, it's the *only* case. We'll change that, by
> getting OLPC_XO1_RTC upstream.
OK, so how about "you're -----d anyway, so please don't block other
development because you haven't gotten your own driver upstream?"
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists