linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/1] (Was: ptrace: clean transitions between TASK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110203204122.GA26371@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:41:22 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc:	jan.kratochvil@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] (Was: ptrace: clean transitions between TASK_STOPPED
	and TRACED)

On 01/28, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Currently, if the task is STOPPED on ptrace attach, it's left alone
> and the state is silently changed to TRACED on the next ptrace call.

In particular, this means that it is very hard to attach correctly.
Any ptrace request needs STOPPED/TRACED tracee, but apart from wait()
there is no simple way to verify this and many applications (imho
rightly) assume that wait() after PTRACE_ATTACH should work.

While this patch should fix this old known problem, it needs more
discussion.

Tejun, Roland, perhaps it makes sense to fix this partcular problem
first? Personally I do not know, but as Jan reports this is really
annoying for gdb at least.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/