[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110203205928.GH6180@angua.secretlab.ca>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:59:28 -0700
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sodaville@...utronix.de,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH TIP 03/14] x86/dtb: Add a device tree for CE4100
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 02:41:47PM +0530, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * David Gibson | 2011-01-27 15:00:27 [+1000]:
> >> + >;
> >> +
> >> + i2c-controller@...00,0,0 {
> >
> >Uh.. that unit address does not look right. The encoding of PCI
> >3-cell addresses into a unit address string is not simply comma
> >separated cells. I forget the details, so you'll need to check the OF
> >PCI binding.
>
> Grant wrote [0]:
> |You'll also note that I added ',0,0' to the end of the address.
> |That's because the node address reflects the parent bus address format
> |which uses 3 cells in this case.
It is quite possible I was mistaken on this point. The PCI binding is
not my area of strength.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists