[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102031354340.1307@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:54:56 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Michael J Wolf <mjwolf@...ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] more detailed per-process transparent hugepage
statistics
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Dave Hansen wrote:
> I'm working on some more reports that transparent huge pages and
> KSM do not play nicely together. Basically, whenever THP's are
> present along with KSM, there is a lot of attrition over time,
> and we do not see much overall progress keeping THP's around:
>
> http://sr71.net/~dave/ibm/038_System_Anonymous_Pages.png
>
> (That's Karl Rister's graph, thanks Karl!)
>
> However, I realized that we do not currently have a nice way to
> find out where individual THP's might be on the system. We
> have an overall count, but no way of telling which processes or
> VMAs they might be in.
>
> I started to implement this in the /proc/$pid/smaps code, but
> quickly realized that the lib/pagewalk.c code unconditionally
> splits THPs up. This set reworks that code a bit and, in the
> end, gives you a per-map count of the numbers of huge pages.
> It also makes it possible for page walks to _not_ split THPs.
>
Nice! I'd like to start using this patchset immediately, I'm hoping
you'll re-propose it with the fixes soon.
Thanks Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists