[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D4BF23A.1050800@maxwell.research.nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:34:02 +0200
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...well.research.nokia.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
CC: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
clemens@...isch.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/12] media: Entity use count
Hi,
And many thanks for the comments!
Hans Verkuil wrote:
...
>> diff --git a/include/media/media-entity.h b/include/media/media-entity.h
>> index b82f824..114541a 100644
>> --- a/include/media/media-entity.h
>> +++ b/include/media/media-entity.h
>> @@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ struct media_entity {
>> struct media_pad *pads; /* Pads array (num_pads elements) */
>> struct media_link *links; /* Links array (max_links elements)*/
>>
>> + int use_count; /* Use count for the entity. */
>
> Isn't unsigned better?
Could be. The result, though, will be slightly more difficult checking
for bad use count --- which always is a driver bug.
me->use_count += change;
WARN_ON(me->use_count < 0);
we must do something like this:
if (change < 0)
WARN_ON(me->use_count < (unsigned)-change);
me->use_count += change;
I'd perhaps also go with unsigned int; the choice for signed was made
mainly since the above check and with signed int the check was more trivial.
Regards,
--
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@...well.research.nokia.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists