linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.37 considered stable?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110204141215.GA5768@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 Feb 2011 06:12:15 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@...bisoft.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.37 considered stable?

On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 04:51:48AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
>  just curious and no criticism intended :-) Is 2.6.37 so stable, that it doesn't 
> need fixes? I mean, it is almost a month out in the wild and no stable release.
> 
>  And no, I have no urgent issues. As I said, just curious.

There is a .37.1 release planned soon, there is a queue of pending
patches for it already in the stable-queue tree if you are curious.

I've just been busy with work and travel lately, combined with nothing
"major" to warrent a new stable release, which has caused the delay.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/