[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1296829915.26581.658.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:31:55 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Stefan Fritsch <sf@...itsch.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agl@...gle.com, tzanussi@...il.com,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Subject: Re: Using ftrace/perf as a basis for generic seccomp
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 20:50 -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
> I'm going to try to work on it over
> the next week or two.
What is your use-case? Going by: http://lwn.net/Articles/332990/ syscall
based stuff (seccomp) is broken by design.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists