linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: P4 PMU -- Fix unflagged overflows test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110204165944.GB21209@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:59:44 -0500
From:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
	Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: P4 PMU -- Fix unflagged overflows test

On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 03:17:28PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Please apply it, sorry for non-inlined patch (have a web access only at moment).
> 
> Note that I've tested the patch on non-HT machine so if someone have HT'ed one
> -- it would be great to test the patch there.

Hmm. For some reason, when I enable the kgdb testsuite, the box fails to
boot with hardlockup issues.  It seems like the code is swallowing the
NMIs? I basically applied this patch on top of 2.6.38-rc3 and ran it on my
Xeon box (p4 w/HT).

Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/