[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110204175751.GA21472@noexit>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:58:01 -0800
From: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
To: dann.frazier@...onical.com
Cc: ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] [ocfs2] Use a kobject instead of a kset
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 09:40:27AM -0700, dann.frazier@...onical.com wrote:
> From: dann frazier <dann.frazier@...onical.com>
>
> We currently allocate a kset and add attributes to its internal kobject.
> However, Documentation/kobject.txt says only the kset code should manipulate
> this internal object, and we can get the same results by just creating our
> own kobject and avoiding a kset altogether.
Hmm, is this actually valid? I thought you had to be a kset to
have children. Did this change at some point?
Joel
--
"Soap and education are not as sudden as a massacre, but they are more
deadly in the long run."
- Mark Twain
http://www.jlbec.org/
jlbec@...lplan.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists