[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimDrWESfmSwRSyhenZTwXovKKa4mSC=Y0=j9yPM@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:44:23 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: fix panic when handling "mem={invalid}" param
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com> wrote:
> Avoid removing all of memory and panicing when "mem={invalid}" is
> specified, e.g. mem=blahblah, mem=0, or mem=nopentium (on platforms
> other than x86_32).
>
> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553464
> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
> Cc: <stable@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> index 294f26d..55a59d8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> @@ -856,6 +856,9 @@ static int __init parse_memopt(char *p)
>
> userdef = 1;
> mem_size = memparse(p, &p);
> + /* don't remove all of memory when handling "mem={invalid}" param */
> + if (mem_size == 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> e820_remove_range(mem_size, ULLONG_MAX - mem_size, E820_RAM, 1);
>
> return 0;
> --
then how about some one pass mem=32M etc?
or total wrongly usermap?
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists