[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m11v3nik19.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:09:38 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: fix binary sysctl overflow
Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com> writes:
> We allocated a vector of CTL_MAXNAME elements and considered
> [0, CTL_MAXNAME] as valid indexes in the vector.
>
> This fixes valid index range to be [0, CTL_MAXNAME).
>
> I guess this should be backported to stable trees too.
No. This part of the code is correct. 0 is a valid index,
and the array is only CTL_MAXNAME entries long.
I think the maximum depth of this table is only about 6, but
feel free to count and tell me CTL_MAXNAME is set too low.
Eric
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/sysctl_binary.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl_binary.c b/kernel/sysctl_binary.c
> index b875bed..e2f377c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl_binary.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl_binary.c
> @@ -1446,7 +1446,7 @@ static ssize_t do_sysctl(int __user *args_name, int nlen,
> int i;
>
> /* Check args->nlen. */
> - if (nlen < 0 || nlen > CTL_MAXNAME)
> + if (nlen < 0 || nlen >= CTL_MAXNAME)
> return -ENOTDIR;
> /* Read in the sysctl name for simplicity */
> for (i = 0; i < nlen; i++)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists