commit 456dc301([PATCH] intel_pmic_gpio: modify EOI handling following change of kernel irq subsystem) changes - desc->chip->eoi(irq); + + if (desc->chip->irq_eoi) + desc->chip->irq_eoi(irq_get_irq_data(irq)); + else + dev_warn(pg->chip.dev, "missing EOI handler for irq %d\n", irq); With the following explanation: "Latest kernel has many changes in IRQ subsystem and its interfaces, like adding irq_eoi" for struct irq_chip, this patch will make it support both the new and old interface." This is completely bogus. #1) The changelog does not match the patch at all #2) This driver relies on the assumption that it sits behind an eoi capable interrupt line. If the implementation of the underlying chip changes from eoi to irq_eoi then this driver has to follow that change and not add a total bogosity. Remove the sillyness and retrieve the interrupt data from irq_desc directly. No need to got through circles to look it up. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Feng Tang Cc: Matthew Garrett Cc: Alan Cox Cc: Alek Du --- drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmic_gpio.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmic_gpio.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmic_gpio.c +++ linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmic_gpio.c @@ -244,11 +244,7 @@ static void pmic_irq_handler(unsigned ir generic_handle_irq(pg->irq_base + gpio); } } - - if (desc->chip->irq_eoi) - desc->chip->irq_eoi(irq_get_irq_data(irq)); - else - dev_warn(pg->chip.dev, "missing EOI handler for irq %d\n", irq); + desc->chip->irq_eoi(get_irq_desc_chip_data(desc)); } static int __devinit platform_pmic_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/