linux-kernel - Re: Supermicro X8DTH-6: Only ~250MiB/s from RAID<->RAID over 10GbE?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D4ED29B.8010903@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 06 Feb 2011 17:55:55 +0100
From:	Zdenek Kaspar <zkaspar82@...il.com>
To:	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
CC:	Stan Hoeppner <stan@...dwarefreak.com>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>,
	Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@...ellique.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-net@...r.kernel.org, Alan Piszcz <ap@...arrain.com>
Subject: Re: Supermicro X8DTH-6: Only ~250MiB/s from RAID<->RAID over 10GbE?

Dne 6.2.2011 14:46, Justin Piszcz napsal(a):
> 
> 
> On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2011, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>>> Justin Piszcz put forth on 2/5/2011 7:08 PM:
>>>
> 
> 
> Hi,

Hi, just few comments for maximal throughput..

> 1. Defaults below:
> sysctl -w net.core.wmem_max=131071
> sysctl -w net.core.rmem_max=131071
> sysctl -w net.core.wmem_default=118784
> sysctl -w net.core.rmem_default=118784
> sysctl -w net.core.optmem_max=20480
> sysctl -w net.ipv4.igmp_max_memberships=20
> sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_mem="379104       505472  758208"
> sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_wmem="4096        16384   4194304"
> sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_rmem="4096        87380   4194304"
> sysctl -w net.ipv4.udp_mem="379104       505472  758208"
> sysctl -w net.ipv4.udp_rmem_min=4096
> sysctl -w net.ipv4.udp_wmem_min=4096
> sysctl -w net.core.netdev_max_backlog=1024

sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps=0

> 2. Optimized settings, for > 800MiB/:
> 
> # for 3ware raid, use 16384 readahead, > 16384 readahead, no improvement
> blockdev --setra 16384 /dev/sda

elevator=deadline

> # not sure if this helps much
> ethtool -K eth0 lro on

Maybe try to _disable_ NIC offloads functions, sometimes its contra
productive (with enough CPU power, but I doubt on 2 socket box) + check
irqbalance..

If you have connection just between machines try the biggest possible MTU.

> # seems to get performance > 600-700MiB/s faster
> sysctl -w net.core.wmem_max=4194304
> sysctl -w net.core.rmem_max=4194304
> sysctl -w net.core.wmem_default=4194304
> sysctl -w net.core.rmem_default=4194304
> sysctl -w net.core.optmem_max=20480
> sysctl -w net.ipv4.igmp_max_memberships=20
> sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_mem="4194304 4194304 4194304"
> sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_wmem="4194304 4194304 4194304"
> sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_rmem="4194304 4194304 4194304"
> sysctl -w net.ipv4.udp_mem="4194304 4194304 4194304"
> sysctl -w net.ipv4.udp_rmem_min=4096
> sysctl -w net.ipv4.udp_wmem_min=4096
> sysctl -w net.core.netdev_max_backlog=1048576
> 
> # the main option that makes all of the difference, the golden option
> # is the rszie and wsize of 1megabyte below:
> 10.0.1.4:/r1    /nfs/box2/r1  nfs  
> tcp,bg,rw,hard,intr,nolock,nfsvers=3,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576  0 0
> 
> CPU utilization:
>   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
>  2069 root      20   0 18640 1304  688 R   91  0.0   0:15.50 cp
>   703 root      20   0     0    0    0 S   25  0.0   2:46.95 kswapd0
> 
> With a single copy I get roughly 700-800MiB/s:
> 
> Device eth0 [10.0.1.3] (1/1):
> ================================================================================
> 
> Incoming:
> ######################     ####################  ####
> ######################     ####################  ####
> ######################     ####################  ####
> ######################     ####################  ####
> ######################     ####################  ####
> ######################     ####################  ####  Curr: 808.71 MByte/s
> ######################     ####################  ####  Avg: 706.11 MByte/s
> ######################     ####################  ####  Min: 0.00 MByte/s
> ######################     ####################  ####  Max: 860.17 MByte/s
> ######################     ####################  ####  Ttl: 344.70 GByte
> 
> With two copies I get up to 830-850MiB/s:
> 
> Device eth0 [10.0.1.3] (1/1):
> ================================================================================
> 
> Incoming:
> ############################################     ####
> ############################################     ####
> ############################################     ####
> ############################################     ####
> ############################################     ####
> ############################################     ####  Curr: 846.61 MByte/s
> ############################################     ####  Avg: 683.14 MByte/s
> ############################################     ####  Min: 0.00 MByte/s
> ############################################     ####  Max: 860.17 MByte/s
> ############################################     ####  Ttl: 305.71 GByte
> 
> Using a 4MiB r/w size with NFS improves performance to sustain > 750MiB/s
> a little better I think:
> 10.0.1.4:/r1    /nfs/box2/r1  nfs  
> tcp,bg,rw,hard,intr,nolock,nfsvers=3,rsize=4194304,wsize=4194304 0

What about using UDP ?

> Anyhow, roughly 750-850MiB/s it would be nice to get 1Gbyte/sec but I guess
> the kerrnel (or my HW, CPU not fast enough) is not there yet.
> 
> Also found a good doc from RedHat:
> http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/2008/downloads/pdf/Thursday/Mark_Wagner.pdf
> 
> 
> Justin.
> 

HTH, Z.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/