[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D4EFCC1.2080607@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 22:55:45 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
davem@...emloft.net, fweisbec@...il.com,
perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net, eranian@...il.com,
robert.richter@....com, acme@...hat.com, ming.m.lin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf_events: add support for Intel fixed counter
2
On 02/05/2011 06:19 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ok, another, easier, choice would be to use event code 0 (and
> umaks 0x1 for instance). I doubt that one will ever be used.
>
>
Seems so, but there is no guarantee I think (at least for p4 there is
0x0 event (tc-deliver-mode)) though 0x1 should make it unique enough.
--
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists