[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201102062341.19631.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 23:41:19 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rpurdie@...ys.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ACPI: Tie ACPI backlight devices to PCI devices if possible
On Sunday, February 06, 2011, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 09:35:07PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > + acpi_get_parent(device->dev->handle, &acpi_parent);
> > > +
> > > + pdev = acpi_get_pci_dev(acpi_parent);
> > > + if (pdev) {
> > > + parent = &pdev->dev;
> > > + pci_dev_put(pdev);
> > > + }
> >
> > I'm afraid you can't do that or suspend problems will happen.
>
> Ugh. Ok, how can we fix this?
Not nicely, I'm afraid.
One possible way is to use device_pm_move_after() to rearrange the devices in
the PM core's suspend list, but that will happen in the video device being
suspended before the new parent (and resumed after it) -- of course, the only
option is to move the ACPI video device after the new parent.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists