| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1297034086.14982.8.camel@pasglop> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:14:46 +1100 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/6] powerpc: convert little-endian bitops macros to static inline functions On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 22:56 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote: > (This patch is intended to be folded into the patch in -mm: > powerpc-introduce-little-endian-bitops.patch) > > The little-endian bitops on powerpc are written as preprocessor > macros with the cast to "unsigned long *". > This means that even non-pointers will be accepted without an error, and > that is a Very Bad Thing. > > This converts the little-endian bitops macros to static inline functions > with proper prototypes. No objection to the powerpc variant of the patches. What is the status with the wholes series tho ? Does it looks like its going to be accepted ? Do you expect my Ack and will merge the whole thing at once ? Does it break bisection unless it's merged as one single giant patch ? Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists