linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Convert tsc_write_lock to raw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D501547.6040907@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:52:39 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
CC:	Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Convert tsc_write_lock to raw_spinlock

On 02/07/2011 05:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> >  I don't know as it is allowed to sleep, it doesn't call any sleeping
> >  functions to my knowledge.  What worries me in the RT case is that the
> >  spinlock acquired for hardware_enable might be preempted and run on
> >  another CPU, which obviously isn't what you want.
>
> I see now, there are calls to raw_smp_processor_id.
>
> I think it's best to make this a raw lock. At this chance, some
> read-only users of vm_list should be rcu'ified. Will have a look.

vm_list is rarely used, for either read or write.  I don't see the need 
to rcu it.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/