[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D502AA5.7040407@siemens.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 18:23:49 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Convert tsc_write_lock to raw_spinlock
On 2011-02-07 18:10, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/07/2011 06:59 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
>>> (well, actually, cpufreq_notifier and kvm_arch_hardware_enable are
>>> already non preemptible, and the stats code should just go away?)
>>
>> The stats code is trivial to convert, so it doesn't matter.
>
> Removal is easier.
Is that stat interface no longer used?
>
>> But what about mmu_shrink and its list_move_tail? How is this
>> synchronized against kvm_destroy_vm - already today?
>
> kvm_destroy_vm() takes kvm_lock. If a vm is destroyed before
> mmu_shrink(), mmu_shrink() will never see it. If we reach mmu_shrink()
> before kvm_destroy_vm(), the latter will wait until mmu_shrink() is done.
>
Ah, I was confused. Would require some more logic if we wanted to make
the loop lock-less, though.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists