[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110207193026.GT10564@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:30:26 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: Hide CONFIG_PM from users
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:14:03PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 07, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> > config PM_DEBUG
> > bool "Power Management Debug Support"
> I think it would be better to simply rename CONFIG_PM_OPS into CONFIG_PM.
That still leaves the IA64 emulator to worry about but I'm not
fundamentally opposed to that, it achieves a similar effect. The main
thing I'm looking for here is to cut down on the configuration options
we have to maintain.
> However, there's a number of things that I'm afraid wouldn't build correctly
> if none of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP and CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME were set in that case.
Actually CONFIG_PM_OPS probably also wants to be on independantly of
those two sometimes for .poweroff() which I'd expect to run even if we
can't suspend.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists