| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1297120144-2142-1-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 18:09:04 -0500 From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com> Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] Clarify source code distribution requirements Some vendors (such as http://users.livejournal.com/joshua_/43185.html) insist that since section 3(b) of GPLv2 does not contain an explicit timeframe for source distribution, they can ignore requests for source for up to 120 days. Clarify the introduction to the license to indicate that this isn't what's meant. Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com> --- COPYING | 6 ++++++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/COPYING b/COPYING index ca442d3..4cda18e 100644 --- a/COPYING +++ b/COPYING @@ -10,6 +10,12 @@ is concerned is _this_ particular version of the license (ie v2, not v2.2 or v3.x or whatever), unless explicitly otherwise stated. + While this version of the GPL does not place an explicit timeframe + upon fulfilment of source distribution under section 3(b), it is the + consensus viewpoint of the Linux community that such distribution + take place as soon as is practical and certainly no more than 14 days + after a request is made. + Linus Torvalds ---------------------------------------- -- 1.7.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists