lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:05:59 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <>,,,
	Borislav Petkov <>,
	Denis Kirjanov <>,
	Franck Bui-Huu <>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <>, Kyle McMartin <>,
	Michael Witten <>,
	Mike Galbraith <>,
	Paul Mackerras <>,
	Peter Zijlstra <>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <>,
	Stephane Eranian <>,
	Steven Rostedt <>,
	Thomas Gleixner <>,
	Tom Zanussi <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] perf/core improvements and fixes

(2011/02/08 2:36), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 02:29:16PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 04:06:40PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
>>> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> wrote:
>>>> Masami Hiramatsu (4):
>>>>   perf probe: Add bitfield member support
>>> hm, the perf probe bits do not build on 32-bit:
>>> util/probe-finder.c: In function ‘convert_variable_type’:
>>> util/probe-finder.c:881: error: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 6 has type ‘unsigned int’
>>> util/probe-finder.c:881: error: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 6 has type ‘unsigned int’
>>> make: *** [util/probe-finder.o] Error 1
>>> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> I already reworked this and force pushed, see:
>> [ committer note: Fixed up '%lu' use for return of die_get_byte_size (int) ]
> Argh, I used '%d', which is ok on 32-bit, but then, breaks 64-bit, i.e.
> the right format is '%zd' since the expression is '... / sizeof(foo)',
> test built on both 64 and 32 bit, this time around it seems final.
> Just give it some time to go from master to git.k.o.

Oops, thanks Arnaldo and Ingo!
BTW, is there any good way to build 32bit perf on x86-64?

2nd Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists