[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201102080940.33251.jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:40:32 +0800
From: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Ben Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@...gle.com>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König"
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 1/3] Add a common struct clk
Hi Ryan,
> > +int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
> > +{
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!clk->ops->enable)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&clk->enable_lock);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave/spin_unlock_irqrestore. This could get called with
> irqs on or off.
Ah, I had planned to change this but (obviously) didn't get to it. Thanks for
the reminder, I'll include this in the next revision.
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists