linux-kernel - Re: lockdep: possible reason: unannotated irqs-off. (was: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110208151551.GB20357@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:15:51 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	x86@...nel.org, tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: lockdep: possible reason: unannotated irqs-off. (was: Re: Linux
 2.6.38-rc4)


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:48 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > Well that and modifying softirq bits for a lockdep annotation really
> > feels wrong. 
> 
> How about we revert it for this release and try again later?

That's the sanest way forward i think ...

I've queued up the revert.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/