linux-kernel - Re: ALSA: Reasonable buffer size / where should it be implemented?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 08 Feb 2011 17:08:37 +0100
From:	Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@...nline.de>
To:	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
CC:	tiwai@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: ALSA: Reasonable buffer size / where should it be implemented?


> It's probably the right way to go. I would only copy data in a tasklet
> not directly in the interrupt routine. New hardware (like HDA) have
> scatter-gather DMA buffers with almost unlimited size, so users can
> just tune the system up.
>
Well, obviously recording to /dev/null has a better chance not to
hit xrun problems ;-)

So I'll clean up my q&d rme96.c code and submit it.

I have not had a look at the sources ... is arecord "right behaving"
or which command line recording tool could be used if it is not?

cu,
 Knut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/