[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297184127.13327.142.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 17:55:27 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: Regression: WARNINGS and lockdep spews in 2.6.38-rc3+
(bisected).
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 19:42 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> My patch is inspired by this http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/16/291
Right, so that splat warns about:
spin_lock_irqsave(&shost->host_lock);
del_timer_sync()
spin_lock_irqsave(&t->split_timeout_timer);
vs
<SOFTIRQ>
call_timer_fn()
spin_lock(&t->split_timeout_timer);
<IRQ>
spin_lock_irqsave(&shost->host_lock);
Which Steven just pointed out is an actual deadlock because:
CPU0 CPU1
spin_lock_irqsave(&shost->host_lock);
<SOFTIRQ>
call_timer_fn();
base->running_timer = timer;
func();
<IRQ>
spin_lock(&shost->host_lock);
del_timer_sync()
while(base->running_timer == timer);
And the world stops turning..
Also note that your patch changes the above to:
spin_lock_irqsave(&shost->host_lock);
del_timer_sync()
spin_lock_bh(&t->split_timeout_timer);
Which wouldn't make one bit of difference.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists