[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D518BBC.8050904@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:30:20 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
CC: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/20] ata_piix: add new PIIX_FLAG_* flags
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>>> Turn open-coded checks in piix_set_timings() into PIIX_FLAG_* flags
>>> per suggestion from Alan Cox.
>>> Suggested-by: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
>> [...]
>>> Index: b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
>>> @@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ enum {
>>> PIIX_FLAG_CHECKINTR = (1 << 28), /* make sure PCI INTx enabled
>>> */
>>> PIIX_FLAG_SIDPR = (1 << 29), /* SATA idx/data pair regs */
>>> + PIIX_FLAG_NO_SITRE = (1 << 30), /* no SITRE register */
>> The register in question is called SIDETIM, SITRE is a bit that enables
>> its use.
> ICH4-M databook that I have at hand (Intel IDE PRM seems to be gone
> from Intel's website, though I'm sure I have a backup _somewhere_) it
> is called SLV_IDETIM so lets just stick with the current naming for
> now..
Why not just say that SITRE is a bit, not register? :-)
> Thanks,
> Bartlomiej
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists