[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimWnT8f=PyLgOOrZOaMx0pdv+yNtPw2T7=kO2G-@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:35:32 -0800
From: Tim Bird <tbird20d@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove CONFIG_PM altogether, enable power management all
the time
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> Rafael, could you do a defconfig-ish x86 build with and without CONFIG_PM, and post
> the 'size vmlinux' comparison - so that we can see the size difference? We make some
> things CONFIG_EXPERT configurable just to enable folks who *really* want to cut down
> on kernel size to configure it out.
I'm one of those people who *really* wants to cut down the kernel size.
I've recently worked on a product where the kernel RAM budget is ~1M.
>
> Note that those usecases, even if they want a super-small kernel, might not care
> about PM at all while they care about size: small boot kernels in ROMs, or simple
> devices where CPU-idling implies deep low power mode, etc.
>
> So the vmlinux size comparisons would be needed really. If it's 5k nobody will care.
I care about 5K. (But honestly, I don't actively hunt stuff less than
10K in size, because
there's too many of them to chase, currently).
-- Tim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists